Calendar

Events

  • De choses à êtres sentients : 10 ans après la réforme du droit animalier @ Cinema DeSève followed by a reception in the lobby J.W. McConnell Building (library) at Concordia University

    15 May 9 h 00 – 16 May 19 h 00

    This first conference of the Observatoire québécois en droit animalier, organized in collaboration with Concordia University’s Social Justice Centre and the Centre de recherche en éthique (CRÉ), with the support of the Université de Sherbrooke and the Chambre des notaires du Québec, invites reflection on the ten-year period following the 2015 reform of animal law, which, from a legal standpoint, shifted the status of animals from things to sentient beings.

    To register for the event, please click here.

    May 15, 2026 – Intensive Research Workshop (by invitation)

    This research workshop on animals provides a space for reflection and discussion centered on works in progress. It is open to research concerning animals across a range of disciplines, including law, philosophy, history, sociology, anthropology, political science, cultural studies, literature, and related fields.

    This intensive workshop is conceived as a privileged opportunity for researchers to engage in in-depth exchanges with one another about a work in progress or a publication project, in a more intimate setting than that of the main conference, while also fostering lasting connections within the research community concerned with animals. It enables participants to discuss their research projects in small groups and to receive constructive critical feedback in preparation for conference presentations, publications, or job talks. The aim is to help researchers refine, enrich, and deepen their ideas.

    Format

    The workshop day will be devoted to the discussion of four papers. Each paper will be discussed in a session structured as follows: a researcher will first briefly present their work in progress. The paper will have been circulated to participants in advance, allowing for careful prior reading. A designated respondent will then offer comments on the paper. Workshop participants will subsequently engage in constructive discussion, questions, and critique of the work.

    May 16, 2026 – Conference opened to the public

    8:30 am – 9:00 am Registration and welcome
    9:00 am – 9:15 am Opening remarks
    9:15 am – 10:15 am

    Comparative perspectives: Reforming animal law in France and Québec

    • Sophie Gaillard (SPCA)
    • Romy Sutra (Université Toulouse Capitole)
    10:15 am – 12:15 pm

    Reforming the foundations of law

    • Virginie Simoneau-Gilbert (Université Queen’s)
    • Michaël Lessard (Université de Sherbrooke)
    • Hania Kassoul (Université Côte d’Azur)
    • Alexandra Popovici (Université de Sherbrooke)
    12:15 – 1:30 pm  Lunch
    1:30 pm – 3:00 pm

    Reforming legal practice

    • Marie-Claude St-Amant (Melançon Marceau Grenier Cohen)
    • Chloé Surprenant (BFGJ & Morasses Avocats)
    • Nicolas Morello (Communauté Droit animalier Québec – DAQ)
    3:00 pm – 3:30 pm  Break
    3:30 pm – 5:00 pm

    Those left behind by Québec animal law

    • Stéphanie Roy (Université de Sherbrooke)
    • Gabrielle Perras St-Jean (INRS)
    5:00 pm – 7:00 pm  Reception with vegan hors d’oeuvres

    *Please note that the workshop will be conducted in French.

    For any inquiries: info@oqda.org

    Read more

  • Roundtable Discussion on Ernest-Marie Mbonda’s Book @ Centre de recherche en éthique

    14 h 00 – 15 h 30

    On Monday, May 18, 2026, from 2:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m., join us for a roundtable discussion on Ernest-Marie Mbonda’s book, Pouvoir, droits et justice en Afrique. Essais de philosophie politique appliquée (2024, L’Harmattan), as part of the partnership between the Centre de recherche en éthique and EthicsLab (Université catholique de l’Afrique centrale). The roundtable will be held in the presence of the author, Ernest-Marie Mbonda (Université catholique d’Afrique centrale), as well as commentators Ryoa Chung (Université de Montréal), Anatole Fogou (Universités, HDR de l’Université de Lille III, École Normale Supérieure, Université de Maroua au Cameroun), Christian Nadeau (Université de Montréal), and Thierry Ngosso (Université catholique d’Afrique centrale).

    The event will be held in hybrid format in room 307 of the Centre de recherche en éthique, located at 2910 Édouard-Montpetit Boulevard in Montreal, Quebec. To join via Zoom, click here.

    We look forward to seeing you there!

    Read more

  • You are cordially invited to the third lecture in the Lecture Series on Invisible Work, organized by the Aesop Chair in collaboration with the Centre de recherche en éthique. For this third lecture, we are pleased to welcome Lisa Herzog (University of Groningen) for a presentation titled “Against Careers.”

    Abstract: This paper argues against work being organized in “careers,” with individuals being expected, over the years, to climb up a ladder of increasing income, power, and status in one specific area of paid work. This organization of work creates an “ideal biography norm” that disadvantages many groups who cannot fulfil it, e.g. active parents and other groups doing “invisible” work. After defining what I mean by “careers” and what kind of critique I raise against the concept, I briefly set out the historical background of how today’s understanding of careers developed. This shows that many arguments that spoke in favor of careers in the past no longer hold. Today, work being organized as careers threatens at least two sets of values: equality of opportunity, understood across people’s whole life, and value pluralism. As an alternative, and to rescue what still stands from the historical arguments in favor of careers, I suggest a model of “merit without careers,” in which certain functional requirements for jobs remain in place, while giving up the assumption of linearity, leaving behind the “ideal biography norm” as the “normal” case. This would better align the organization of work with the values of equality of opportunity and value pluralism.

    The event will take place on May 19th, 2026, at noon in room 422 of the Department of Philosophy at the Université de Montréal (2910 Boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montreal, QC) in hybrid format.

    Please register via the following link. To participate via Zoom, click here (Meeting ID: 704 532 7051; passcode: 9Me2EW). 

    The Lecture Series on Invisible Work is an initiative by Denise Celentano (University of Montreal), holder of the Aesop Chair, in collaboration with the Centre de recherche en éthique. For more information, please contact Denise Celentano (UdeM) denise.celentano@umontreal.ca or Dominic Martin (UQAM) martin.dominic@uqam.ca.

    General information about the Lecture Series: The concept of invisible work describes the forms of work that fall outside the traditional model of waged employment and are not recognized, in a monetary and/or symbolic sense, to the point that even their nature as “work” is often disputed. Invisible work takes place behind the scenes of more recognized and valued work. Given its liminal nature with respect to long-established categories, it serves as a prism for exploring a number of issues, from recognition to social segregation to the critical questioning of the normative assumptions behind what is supposed to count as “work.” The notion of invisible work promises to shed light, as it were, on the mechanisms of valorization that operate behind social cooperation. This series of lectures, open to the public, explores the subject from both a philosophical and interdisciplinary perspective.

    Read more

  • New Research in Political Philosophy @ McGill University, LEA 429 (Tuesday), LEA 937 (Wednesday)

    26 May – 27 May All day

    The CRÉ invites you to a workshop in political philosophy, organized by Sari Kisilevsky (Queens College, CUNY).

    Confirmed participants:

    Louis-Philippe Hodgson (York University)
    Sari Kisilevsky (CUNY, Queens College)
    Éliot Litalien (Université de Montréal)
    Vida Panitch (Carleton University)
    Jonathan Peterson (Rice University)
    Sandra Raponi (Merrimack College)
    Juliette Roussin (Université Laval)
    Patrick Turmel (Université Laval)
    Kristin Voigt (McGill University)

    Register here!

    Read more

  • The CRÉ, the Social Justice Centre (SJC) and the Research Group on Environmental and Animal Ethics (GRÉEA) are pleased to welcome David J. Holroyd (University of Sheffield), who will give a talk entitled Navigating the Leviathan: A Skeptical Ethos for Animal Politics.

    Abstract

    Within contemporary Animal Politics, the state is frequently positioned as the primary vehicle for justice, with animals framed as the ‘next frontier’ for integration via legal rights and representation. However, this extensionist approach frequently overlooks the state’s historic role in facilitating the systemic exclusion and political subordination of nonhuman animals. Given this reality, how should animalist scholars orient themselves toward the state?

    This presentation proposes a skeptical ethos toward the state, moving beyond the binary of statist optimism and anarchist dismissal. The talk addresses three core features of this orientation:

    1)     Recognising historical realities: State-building projects have historically caused many animal injustices, undermining the state’s presumed emancipatory potential.

    2)     Engaging with imperfect institutions: Political complexities must be navigated case-by-case, since an outright rejection of statist approaches may expose animals to more severe injustices.

    3)     Expanding political imaginations: To envisage radical forms of politics beyond the anthropocentric status quo, one must step outside an exclusively statist framework for ‘doing politics’.

    By cultivating a skeptical ethos, scholars (and activists) can move beyond entrenched dogmas to discover more reliable, nuanced, and effective modes of political engagement with the Leviathan.

    Biography:

    David John Holroyd is a PhD candidate in political theory at the University of Sheffield, funded by the White Rose College of Arts and Humanities. His research broadly addresses the themes of animal justice, state power, social identity, and the role of academic ideas in public debate.

    Chair:

    Juliette Roussin (Université Laval).

    To participate on Zoom, click here (Meeting ID: 704 532 7051; Secret code: 9Me2EW).

    Read more

  • Annual Intensive Research Workshop

    The aim of the Social Justice Theory Workshop is to enable sustained exploration in the theory of social justice. It addresses topics such as the articulation of ideals and principles of economic, political, gender, race, environmental, and cultural justice; the critique of inequality, domination, exploitation, and alienation; and the illumination of political institutions, practices and processes of transformation that might foster progressive change.

    Workshop papers will be pre-circulated, and participation implies a commitment to reading the papers in advance.

    This workshop is organized by Pablo Gilabert and Peter Dietsch, in association with the Social Justice Centre (Université Concordia), the Centre de recherche en éthique (Université de Montréal) and the Department of Philosophy at the University of Victoria.

    The 10th edition of this intensive research workshop will take place on May 28 and 29, 2026, in room MB 14.250 at Concordia University’s John Molson Pavilion, located at 1450 Guy Street in Montreal, Quebec.

    The workshop will be in person. Places are limited and registration is required. If you would like to participate, please contact Christiane Bailey at the following address before May 1st : sjc@concordia.ca.

    Speakers:

    • Peter Dietsch (University of Victoria) and Thomas Rixen: “How to Catalyse the Green Transition: Insulation, Expansion, and the Politics of Distribution”
      – Commentator: Matthias Fritsch (Concordia University)
    • Pablo Gilabert (Concordia University) : “Why We Should Support Working Artists”
      – Commentator: Louis-Philippe Hodgson (York University)
    • Cristina Lafont (Northwestern University) : “Inequality and the Human Rights Project”
      – Commentator: Dominique Leydet (Université du Québec à Montréal)
    • Sanjay Reddy (New School for Social Research) : “Intergenerational concern in a new key »
      – Commentator: Mauro Rossi (Université du Québec à Montréal)
    • Gina Schouten (Harvard University) : “On Educational Opportunity”
      – Commentator: Andrée-Anne Cormier (École Nationale d’Administration Publique)
    • Vid Simoniti (University of Liverpool) : “Democratic control of cultural change through images”
      – Commentator: Ryoa Chung (University of Montréal)

    For more information, please consult the following link.

    Read more

  • Workshop on the Philosophy of Mental Health @ Université du Québec à Montréal

    9 h 30 – 17 h 00

    You are cordially invited to a workshop on the philosophy of mental health, scheduled for May 28, 2026, from 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The event will take place in room W-5305 of the Thérèse-Casgrain Building at the Université du Québec à Montréal, located at 455 René-Lévesque Boulevard East in Montreal.

    Schedule:

    Morning session, chaired by Anne-Marie Gagné-Julien (Université Laval)

    • 9:30 a.m. – 9:40 a.m.: Opening remarks
    • 9:40 a.m. – 10:25 a.m.: Sandrine Renaud (Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières), “Injustices Experienced by Adults Diagnosed with Psychotic Disorders in Mental Health Care: A Scoping Review”
    • 10:25 a.m. – 10:30 a.m.: Break
    • 10:30 a.m. – 11:15 a.m.: Axel Constant (University of Sussex), “The participatory stance: A veritistic social epistemology for patient knowledge”
    • 11:15 a.m. – 11:20 a.m.: Break
    • 11:20 a.m. – 12:05 p.m.: Shannon Mahony and Owen Chevalier, “Beyond listening: epistemic conflict in anorexia nervosa and the participatory solution”
    • 12:05 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.: Lunch

    Afternoon session (I), chaired by Luc Faucher (Université du Québec à Montréal)

    • 1:30 p.m. – 2:15 p.m.: Ian Gold (McGill University), “Devices and Delusions: James Tilly Matthews and the Air Loom”
    • 2:15 p.m. – 2:20 p.m.: Break
    • 2:20 p.m. – 3:05 p.m.: Alexandre Poisson (Université du Québec à Montréal), “Autistic Expertise Matters: from Participatory Autism in Research to a Participatory Philosophy of Autism”
    • 3:05 p.m. – 3:20 p.m.: Break

    Afternoon session (II), chaired by Ian Gold (McGill University)

    • 3:20 p.m. – 4:05 p.m.: Matthew Valiquette (McGill University), “Towards a Culture of Quantification: Machine-Learning in Mental Health”
    • 4:05 p.m. – 4:10 p.m.: Break
    • 4:10 p.m. – 4:55 p.m.: Florence Legault, “Epistemic injustices in healthcare: rethinking the agency of individuals diagnosed with borderline personality disorder through an enactive and ecological view of cognition”
    • 4:55 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.: Closing remarks

    The registration deadline is Sunday, May 24, 2026. To register, please scan the QR code below.

    Read more

  • Third Session – CRÉ Graduate Fellows’ Seminar @ Room 309, CRÉ, hybrid

    13 h 30 – 15 h 00

    You are invited to the third session of the 2025–2026 edition of the CRÉ Graduate Fellows’ Seminar.

    On this occasion, France Lacharité and Nohémi Bokuma will present their research projects. Each presentation will last approximately 20 minutes and will be immediately followed by a discussion of about 25 minutes.

    The aim of the Seminar is to provide our graduate fellows with constructive feedback and critical input to help them strengthen their research projects. It also offers them an opportunity to practise delivering a presentation in a format comparable to that of academic conferences. We very much hope that many of you will take part in this activity, which we intend to be particularly valuable as a learning experience.

    Program:

              1) 3:00–3:45 p.m. — Presentation by France Lacharité, PhD candidate in Contemporary Religious Studies at the Université de Sherbrooke, supervised by Bertrand Lavoie, Marc Dumas, and Louise La Fontaine

    Coping with Finitude: Limits, Vulnerabilities, and Meaning in Pediatric End-of-Life Care

    In December 2015, Québec’s Act Respecting End-of-Life Care came into force, recognizing medical assistance in dying (MAID) as a form of end-of-life care for certain individuals aged 18 and over. After more than ten years of implementation, growing social acceptance and a reduction in resistance within the medical community have prompted discussions about extending MAID to other groups, including certain minors. More broadly, the question of MAID raises a number of issues, notably concerning our relationship to life and death.

    Confronting death is difficult in itself, but it becomes even more complex when it concerns a child. In this context, the death of a child leads healthcare professionals to experience intense emotions and to face various limits (legal, professional, moral, or ethical). They are thus confronted with their own vulnerability, which can give rise to ethical, moral, and existential questions.

    This presentation aims to share preliminary findings from a qualitative study conducted in a Québec pediatric hospital, based on shadowing observations of five healthcare professionals and approximately fifty semi-structured interviews with different types of caregivers.

    Initial analyses highlight interactions with families and the challenges that arise when questions of time, hope, and meaning emerge as the end of life approaches. They also bring to light certain needs of healthcare professionals when providing pediatric end-of-life care.

              2) 3:45–4:30 p.m. — Presentation by Nohémi Bokuma, MA student in Political Science at Concordia University, supervised by Dr. Stephanie Paterson and Dr. Jonathan Martineau.

    Examining and identifying the gaps in Canadian policies and how they respond to digital gender-based violence

    Digital gender-based violence in Canada is increasing and even materializes beyond the internet and into our real world. Alek Minassian was found guilty of the “2018 Toronto van attack, […] the deadliest incident linked to the incel movement” (Beckett 2021), a sub-culture of men who believe “that women use their sexual power to dominate [them] socially” (Basu 2020). Thus, through an analysis of this emerging dimension of misogynistic digital violence, this master’s thesis will examine how Canadian policies interact with digital gender-based violence, with the sexist radicalization of young men online, and will also critique the technologies that facilitate this precise and gendered violence. The central question arises from the following observation: the feelings shared amongst internet users, namely the sense of belonging to a community, freedom and anonymity, in addition to the “differences between web hosts” (Ganesh 2018, 38) and the lack of unified regulations, all lead to the undermining of women’s cybersecurity. As a result, as groups such as those from the manosphere are allowed to migrate from one platform to another, further escaping the threat of their online community being shut down and maximizing their promotion of a misogynistic digital culture, women’s digital security is weakened and is made even more vulnerable.

    Through this analysis, the following questions emerge: the ethics behind the current practices (and the policies that govern them) of platforms such as Reddit, 4Chan, Meta and X (Twitter), the governance and ethics advanced technologies and artificial intelligence within these platforms, and finally, the question of the power acquired and the profit generated by these companies at the expense of women.

    Chair: Ryoa Chung (UdeM).

    To participate via Zoom, click here (Meeting ID: 704 532 7051; Passcode: 9Me2EW).

    Read more